The difference in Coxeter length of a permutation and its image under the Simion-Schmidt map. The Simion-Schmidt map takes a permutation and turns each occcurrence of [3,2,1] into an occurrence of [3,1,2], thus reducing the number of inversions of the permutation. This statistic records the difference in length of the permutation and its image. Apparently, this statistic can be described as the number of occurrences of the mesh pattern ([3,2,1], {(0,3),(0,2)}). Equivalent mesh patterns are ([3,2,1], {(0,2),(1,2)}), ([3,2,1], {(0,3),(1,3)}) and ([3,2,1], {(1,2),(1,3)}).

The sum of the products of all pairs of parts. This is the evaluation of the second elementary symmetric polynomial which is equal to $$e_2(\lambda) = \binom{n+1}{2} - \sum_{i=1}^\ell\binom{\lambda_i+1}{2}$$ for a partition $\lambda = (\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_\ell) \vdash n$, see [1]. This is the maximal number of inversions a permutation with the given shape can have, see [2, cor.2.4].

The monochromatic index of a connected graph. This is the maximal number of colours such that there is a colouring of the edges where any two vertices can be joined by a monochromatic path. For example, a circle graph other than the triangle can be coloured with at most two colours: one edge blue, all the others red.

The Grundy value of Chomp on Ferrers diagrams. Players take turns and choose a cell of the diagram, cutting off all cells below and to the right of this cell in English notation. The player who is left with the single cell partition looses. The traditional version is played on chocolate bars, see [1]. This statistic is the Grundy value of the partition, that is, the smallest non-negative integer which does not occur as value of a partition obtained by a single move.

The spin of an integer partition. The Ferrers shape of an integer partition $\lambda$ can be decomposed into border strips. The spin is then defined to be the total number of crossings of border strips of $\lambda$ with the vertical lines in the Ferrers shape. The following example is taken from Appendix B in [1]: Let $\lambda = (5,5,4,4,2,1)$. Removing the border strips successively yields the sequence of partitions $$(5,5,4,4,2,1), (4,3,3,1), (2,2), (1), ().$$ The first strip $(5,5,4,4,2,1) \setminus (4,3,3,1)$ crosses $4$ times, the second strip $(4,3,3,1) \setminus (2,2)$ crosses $3$ times, the strip $(2,2) \setminus (1)$ crosses $1$ time, and the remaining strip $(1) \setminus ()$ does not cross. This yields the spin of $(5,5,4,4,2,1)$ to be $4+3+1 = 8$.

The dinv adjustment of an integer partition. The Ferrers shape of an integer partition $\lambda = (\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_k)$ can be decomposed into border strips. For $0 \leq j < \lambda_1$ let $n_j$ be the length of the border strip starting at $(\lambda_1-j,0)$. The dinv adjustment is then defined by $$\sum_{j:n_j > 0}(\lambda_1-1-j).$$ The following example is taken from Appendix B in [2]: Let $\lambda=(5,5,4,4,2,1)$. Removing the border strips successively yields the sequence of partitions $$(5,5,4,4,2,1),(4,3,3,1),(2,2),(1),(),$$ and we obtain $(n_0,\ldots,n_4) = (10,7,0,3,1)$. The dinv adjustment is thus $4+3+1+0 = 8$.